JERUSALEM – Ten years have passed since the “dethronement” of Irenaios, Patriarch of Jerusalem, which started with a Panorthodox Conference convened by Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew at the Phanar.
The charge against Irenaios was that he was selling real property to Israeli companies. The Conference placed Irenaios outside of the Church Diptychs and the Synod of Jerusalem defrocked him, lowering him to the rank of Monk. Irenaios remains confined in his cell since 2008. He told his story to TNH in a written interview.
TNH: Your Beatitude, how many years have you been confined in your cell?
PI: Eight years. Since February of 2008, I have not been able to leave my cell in the Patriarchate, which was given to me at the time Benedict served as Patriarch, and where I continued to live after my election as Patriarch, and continue to the present day with God’s strength.
TNH: Why are you in confinement?
Irenaios: It started two months after Israel’s recognition of Archbishop Theophilus of Tabor as Patriarch. Since then, two people, Theophilus and Archbishop of Constantina Aristarchus have locked the two external iron doors that lead into the courtyard of my cell.
TNH: How do you survive? What do you eat? Do you have electricity and heat?
PI: By the grace of God, noble people from the Old City who have known me for many years, as well as Cypriot and Greek pilgrims from time to time, bring me the necessities for my livelihood, which I pull up to my cell with a basket from the roof of my cell, toward the road of the Patriarchate.
TNH: you haven’t visited a doctor all these years or a dentist?
PI: On the one hand, they do not permit entrance to anyone, not even a doctor or a dentist, in order to visit me – not one tooth of mine has remained, – saying that I have died, that I don’t exist, that I have left, or they send anyone who wants to visit me to Aristarchus, who, after asking Theophilus, either doesn’t respond at all to the pilgrims or refuses, saying that supposedly there are rules that do not permit this.
TNH: How do you answer to the Patriarchate of Jerusalem, which alleges that you are self-confined?
PI: Only if someone is imprisoned or in custody or under special conditions that limit his freedom are the police responsible for transporting this individual or permitting visitation with him, except if, as Patriarch, I make use of the support provided by the state police for the safeguarding of my transportation or of my bodily integrity.
TNH: If we visit Jerusalem next week may we come to see you?
PI: Hopefully, but they will not allow you, as they have done to others, even my niece, who came from the United States. They did not permit her entrance to see me face to face, and she left full of grief. No person, whether a relative or otherwise, has been able to see me, regardless of how far they may have traveled. And even if they permit you, as soon as you leave, the same conditions of confinement will prevail.
TNH: Has Patriarch Theophilus visited you all these years? Did he ever call you? Has he shown any care as human being?
PI: The last time we met was when I summoned him to my cell and asked him if he has anything against me, since I had heard that he had signed a libel [document] against me. He assured me that he would never sign anything against me and that he is at my side. Shortly after, he put his signature on this document disavowing me, which they did not have the courage to set before me in a synodical session, so that I might at least present a defense concerning all the matters that they were accusing me, but they gathered signatures on foot, in the corridors, and the library, from a portion of the Brotherhood that did not surpass 35 out of the one hundred members of the Brotherhood. Since then, I never saw Theophilus again, nor did he communicate with me.
TNH: Do those who comprise the Brotherhood of the Holy Places – the hierarchs, the priests, the monastics – communicate with you?
PI: I communicate daily by telephone with the Monks, Clergy, and Bishops of the Brotherhood of the All-Holy Sepulchre. They cannot visit me, since the gates are locked, not even from the railings or the gate window, because the cameras there will locate them, and afterward they will suffer consequences from Theophilus.
TNH: Where this situation is going to lead?
PI: With mathematical precision, we are heading toward the loss of our capacity of managing and safeguarding the status quo of the All-Holy Veneration Sites, since Theophilus, in order to be on good terms with everyone, and to have the support of state and transnational agents, as well as that of religious communities, is betraying the ancient rights of the Orthodox, assigning the repair and preservation of the Universal Veneration Sites, such as the All-Holy Sepulchre and Bethlehem to companies, the administration of which does not safeguard the same pledges for protection as those of the Patriarchate, and distributing the ownership of Patriarchal Land, having delivered the keys of Bethlehem to the Latins.
TNH: What should be done?
PI: If Theophilus had even the slightest sense of the inferno that he has created, he ought to have already abdicated willingly from the Throne, upon which he ascended in an adulterous manner, according to the Sacred Canons’ definitions. As soon as my bonds are loosened and I am able to come into contact with the Members of the Brotherhood of the All-Holy Sepulchre, I will summon them to restore the Patriarchate of Jerusalem to its proper course of functioning. Now everyone knows what happened and why it happened.
TNH: How do you explain the silence of the Church of Greece, except for some hierarchs who stir your issue from time to time?
PI: Archbishop Ieronymos knows better than anyone about the difficult situation in which I have lived since my election and during my first years as Patriarch. I know that he is most dissatisfied and deeply hurt because of my situation – that I am being treated so inhumanely, and above all in the Patriarchate. He is the only one who, due to his position, is capable of removing the abomination of his Predecessor against me.
TNH: How do you explain the stance of the rest of Patriarchs and Prelates?
PI: The Patriarch of Alexandria had not only understood that we were right at the Pan-Orthodox Conference at the Phanar in 2005, and he personally told me that he would support our positions. However at the session’s critical moment, he agreed with the Ecumenical Patriarch, who wanted my head on a platter, for reasons that he knows, and he got it! The only Patriarch who ought to have forcefully stood against me, since the accusation was that I “sold” property of strategic significance that belonged to the Patriarchate to companies of Jewish interests, would have been the then-elder Patriarch of Antioch, because he is Arab-speaking. However, he played a leading role, through Metropolitan of Beirut Elijah, in not accepting my removal, since no actual accusation had been substantiated. The Churches of Georgia and Poland followed him, while the Churches of Serbia, Bulgaria and the Czech Republic abstained, because neither did they sufficiently know the matter under discussion nor did they have time to study it, due to the swiftness of the Pan-Orthodox Conference’s convocation, which they even mentioned to the Ecumenical Patriarch. The Church of Greece then was under fire by the government, and Archbishop Christodoulos of blessed memory succumbed.
Unfortunately, Cyprus followed suit, since, even though the current head, and this is to his honor, did not identify himself with the unsubstantiated position of the Ecumenical Patriarch, the other two members of the three-member delegation shared the Patriarch’s view. The remaining Churches, seven all together, against three who were absent and four who were opposed, were besieged with psychological pressuring and the Ecumenical Patriarch’s command toward me: “Irenaeus, pacify the Church, resign,” and since I did not resign, the exhortation turned into a decree: “Away with him, away with him, crucify him, for the “peace of the Church.”
TNH: Did you resign on your own from your Throne?
PI: I did not resign nor will I resign, as long as I am breathing, from the Throne of Jerusalem, which consequently was not vacant, not because of my insistence on any spiritual or administrative authority, but as a witness of faith, dedication to my Schema, to the All-Holy Sepulchre, to my Brothers of the All-Holy Sepulchre.
TNH: Did that factional Synod of Jerusalem at that time have the authority to defrock you, since you were after all a Patriarch of one of the five Ancient Patriarchates?
PI: No, in no way. Neither was the Pan-Orthodox Conference of the Heads convened as a judicial body to judge me, but it sought that I proceed to the “sacrificial act” of resignation, to which I did not proceed. The factional “synod” that was illegally and non-canonically convened in Jerusalem by a group of thirteen Members of the Brotherhood of the All-Holy Sepulchre, without me having been deposed or having been legally removed, without the Throne consequently being vacant, is characterized as and is a Conventicle, according to the Divine and Sacred Canons of the Church. What they did is a Desecration.
The post Former Patriarch Irenaios’ “Letter from Jerusalem Jail” to TNH appeared first on The National Herald.